Each year since 1997, the US-based Electronic Privacy Information Center and the UK-based Privacy International have undertaken what has now become the most comprehensive survey of global privacy ever published. The latest 2007 global rankings extend the survey to 47 countries (from an original 37) and, for the first time, provide an opportunity to assess trends. The intention behind this project is two-fold. First, to recognize countries in which privacy protection and respect for privacy is nurtured. This is done in the hope that others can learn from their example. Second, to identify countries in which governments and privacy regulators have failed to create a healthy privacy environment. The aim is not to humiliate the worst ranking nations, but to demonstrate that it is possible to maintain a healthy respect for privacy within a secure and fully functional democracy.
The key findings are:
- The 2007 rankings indicate an overall worsening of privacy protection across the world, reflecting an increase in surveillance and a declining performance on privacy safeguards.
- Concern over immigration and border control dominated the world agenda in 2007. Countries have moved swiftly to implement database, identity and fingerprinting systems, often without regard to the privacy implications for their own citizens.
- The 2007 rankings show an increasing trend amongst governments to archive data on the geographic, communications and financial records of all their citizens and residents. This trend leads to the conclusion that all citizens, regardless of legal status, are under suspicion.
- The lowest ranking countries in the survey continue to be Malaysia, Russia and China. The highest-ranking countries in 2007 are Greece, Romania and Canada. The worst ranking EU country is the United Kingdom, which again fell into the "black" category along with Russia and Singapore. In terms of statutory protections and privacy enforcement, the US is the worst ranking country in the democratic world (the US Patriot Act - Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism - was signed into law on 26 October, 2001). Argentina scored higher than 18 of the 27 EU countries. Australia ranks higher than Slovakia but lower than South Africa and New Zealand.
- The privacy trends have been fueled by the emergence of a profitable surveillance industry (eg 安防科技(中国)有限公司- China Security & Surveillance Technology [CSR] NYSE listed Shenzhen based company)dominated by global IT companies and the creation of numerous international treaties that frequently operate outside judicial or democratic processes.
The potential for engagement of these developments is currently limited to a marginal response. The problem for civil society – or indeed anyone wishing to challenge surveillance - is not simply the sheer magnitude of the threat, but also its complexity and diversity.
As this article is not meant to stir a rip-roaring debate on the moral direction of human rights and privacy concerns, it is nevertheless intriguing how the human spirit can still consistently prevail and triumph within these government strictures across all cultures. Economic Man or as it really cuts to the core of the theories of 18th century thinkers such as Adam Smith and David Ricardo. In "The Wealth of Nations" Smith wrote: " It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest." In modern day terms, so the phrase "there is no such thing as a free lunch" was coined.
- Concern over immigration and border control dominated the world agenda in 2007. Countries have moved swiftly to implement database, identity and fingerprinting systems, often without regard to the privacy implications for their own citizens.
- The 2007 rankings show an increasing trend amongst governments to archive data on the geographic, communications and financial records of all their citizens and residents. This trend leads to the conclusion that all citizens, regardless of legal status, are under suspicion.
- The lowest ranking countries in the survey continue to be Malaysia, Russia and China. The highest-ranking countries in 2007 are Greece, Romania and Canada. The worst ranking EU country is the United Kingdom, which again fell into the "black" category along with Russia and Singapore. In terms of statutory protections and privacy enforcement, the US is the worst ranking country in the democratic world (the US Patriot Act - Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism - was signed into law on 26 October, 2001). Argentina scored higher than 18 of the 27 EU countries. Australia ranks higher than Slovakia but lower than South Africa and New Zealand.
- The privacy trends have been fueled by the emergence of a profitable surveillance industry (eg 安防科技(中国)有限公司- China Security & Surveillance Technology [CSR] NYSE listed Shenzhen based company)dominated by global IT companies and the creation of numerous international treaties that frequently operate outside judicial or democratic processes.
The potential for engagement of these developments is currently limited to a marginal response. The problem for civil society – or indeed anyone wishing to challenge surveillance - is not simply the sheer magnitude of the threat, but also its complexity and diversity.
As this article is not meant to stir a rip-roaring debate on the moral direction of human rights and privacy concerns, it is nevertheless intriguing how the human spirit can still consistently prevail and triumph within these government strictures across all cultures. Economic Man or as it really cuts to the core of the theories of 18th century thinkers such as Adam Smith and David Ricardo. In "The Wealth of Nations" Smith wrote: " It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest." In modern day terms, so the phrase "there is no such thing as a free lunch" was coined.
Watched or not watched, that is probably not the question.
0 comments:
Post a Comment